Media Corporations Profiting from Violence

Media companies are profiting from violence. If you are found on the way, in the case of shooting at a school, or an airplane to the World Trade Center, these pictures are played many times on a TV and disgust. I will re-appear in books and movies. Current packaging and sales of violence belongs to television - the television will keep reminding us. Special custom armor covers his body from neck to toe. When the black gunman crouched down the street, the police in Los Angeles launched a powerful semi - automatic rifle randomly sitting on their television.

Media violence has been discussed and debated over the years. Writers like Jonathan L. Freedman have revealed a question revealing ways that corporate storytellers pay less attention to giving aggressive cultural value than investing large amounts of money . These millions of dollar companies know that violence is an important profit growth and use violence to increase income indiscriminately. - Television is the source of the most widely shared image and information in history, the mainstream of a common symbolic environment where children are born and play an important role in our lives. It can be argued that violence by media can lead to social violence and its influence has a big influence on it.

Media violence is one of the most unmanned problems in the United States. Over the years the media has deteriorated further due to high demand for violence. Many people do not understand the influence of media violence. Media violence is a bad thing, it affects those who are watching it. Since the 1950 's, the government has been worried about the influence of media violence on viewers. Initially, there were not many people who owned television, so this was not a big problem. But in the 1960s media proved to be very popular. At that time, nearly 50 million people used TV (Thinkquest) at home. In 1972, an American surgeon

The main findings are that violence against the media will affect everyone. Because they have negative consequences in their lives, elderly people may be affected more than young people. Media violence does not reflect social violence. Violence is often disinfected, beautified and the adverse effects of violence are not shown. Unpaid violence makes the audience insensitive and hardly noticed by the public, so it is more dangerous than graphic violence. While insisting that it meets market demand, the media is shaping our preferences. The myth of "a strong appeal to violence" (Porter 211) was created by a media group that wants to maintain profits forever. Marketers claim to have rights to freedom of expression, but instead they should stop advertising the formula of violence and open doors to creative alternatives. Media violence content review and evaluation system is necessary, but should be "managed" by independent public sources.

Media violence and its impact on society and youth Molina Bay, California State University Irina Rice - School