MAT 510 - week 4 Case Study 1 - 1 Statistical Thinking in...

2 Summary of Statistical Thinking in Health Care In this case study, we will examine the process of filling out prescriptions with a pharmacist, his assistant, and other staff. Currently, pharmacies are under review due to incorrect filling of prescription drugs, and many customers filed lawsuits against pharmacies. Create a flowchart on the recipe filling process and assign some important questions within it. Then use the Supplier, Input, Process Step, Output and Customer (SIPOC) model to analyze and identify the main root cause of the problem. To analyze the process and fix the problem, identify the main tools to use and the data you need to collect. Finally we propose solutions to ongoing problems and suggest strategies to measure solutions to ensure their sustainability.

Statistical Thinking in Health Care 1 Case Study: Statistical Thinking in Health Care Marquise Daniels Dr. Peter Sue MAT 510 Statistical Thinking in Health Care on 12 May 2015 2 In this case study I will explain by HMO pharmacy Assigned drug error problems The dispensing error rate is generally low, but further improvement in interpharmacy distribution systems is still important, as pharmacies allocate such large amounts of medication. Even with a low error rate, it can be equivalent to a number of litigation counterparts. Larger money In order to distribute errors in outpatient medical institutions in the US and Europe and regional pharmacies further research is needed. Among all the errors mentioned, I think that distribution errors are the most common

We recorded 510 births and 7 (1.4%) stillbirth, the control group had 512 births and 5 people (1%) stillbirth. The level of Hb A2 in our case is usually about 4-6%. Baseline characteristics of subjects in both study groups are shown in the table. With these baseline characteristics, there was no statistically significant difference between these groups. There was no significant difference between these groups with regard to pregnancy hypertension and gestational diabetes (Table 2). While amniotic fluid (AFI> 24 cm) was observed in 4% of cases and 9% of control group, oligohydrolilar amniotic fluid was observed in 10.8% of cases and 4% of control group (P = 0.001 , Table 2). Regarding perinatal complications, IUGR occurred in 1% of the case group and 5% in the control group (P = 0.073). The cesarean section rate of the case group was significantly higher than that of the control group (38.3% vs. 26.5%; P = 0.001, Table 3)

Table 1 shows the features of all the research included in the systematic review. Of the eight included studies, four were case control studies, three were cohort studies, and one was nest case control study. The sample size of these studies ranged from 96 to 6945. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) have been reported as indicators of psychological stress and abortion relationship in all eight studies 1, 2, 7, and 8 Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS ) Results Six of our studies included 7 to 9 stars and 2 studies were evaluated as 6 stars (shown as Supplement Table S1). In seven studies, high comparability was achieved by adjusting or matching at least one confounding factor: maternal age, pregnancy period, pregnancy history, consumption of caffeine and tobacco, and social support