Maslow and Erikson - Compare and Contrast

: Physical Needs, Safety Needs, Attribution and Affection Needs, Respect for Needs and Self-Realization Needs

: Trust and distrust, autonomy and doubt and shame, initiative and guilt, diligence and inferiority, cohesion of identity and confusion of the identity (crisis of identity), intimacy and isolation, production and stagnation, and finally self-completion and despair

Comparison and comparison Erik Erikson and Sigmund Freud contrast and contrast the two most influential psychologists, Sigmund Freud and Erie, who formed a way to understand the development of human thought. Ericsson In this article we will focus on similarities and differences between Freud's psychological theory and Ericsson's psychosocial theory. Freud was one of the first psychologists who influenced how we study human beings. Erikson recognizes that Erik Homberger Erikson of Freud was born in 1902 to the Danish parents in Frankfurt, Germany. Eric learned art and various languages ​​at his school days, not science courses in biology and chemistry. He did not go on to college because he did not like the atmosphere created by formal school education, but traveled throughout Europe to record his experience diary. After doing this for a year, he returned to Germany and entered the art school. A few years later, Ericsson started teaching art.

The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the two competing human behavioral psychology theories. The two chosen theories are Erik Erikson's "eight stages of human development" and Abraham Maslow's "self-contained humanitarian theory". These are chosen because of fundamental differences in human development methods. Ericsson's theory comes from the background of psychoanalysis, we were born as a blank canvas, extending personality from childhood. Maslow's theory comes from the humanistic background and adopts a more comprehensive approach to development and our "identity". (Www.simplynumbers.com). It also shows the possibility of our development not only during childhood but throughout the life cycle. This paper shows that there are some similarities between the two theories, but the number of differences is much greater.