Marxism and Economic Theory

The interpersonal relationship between Marxism and economic theory is always dynamic. Change and adaptability are closely related to the passage of time in human society. Systems for managing, directing and controlling social resources have been developed. These systems are called government, resources are called people or residents and productivity. The government is full of energy and must reflect social change. Sometimes these systems resist the need to adapt to its component (social) and cause a flaw between the system and its regulated system.

This leads us to three dimensions of Marxism. Marxism is an analysis of economic theory or doctrine, how capitalism functions as an economic system. It is based on an analysis of how productivity and production relationships work. For example, in a factory, workers work on raw materials to convert these raw materials into objects, in the course of which the workers add something to the raw materials and make objects (raw materials + labor) more valuable than the original raw materials I will make it. What a worker adds is called "surplus value" in Marxist theory. Workers are paid according to their work, but remuneration is calculated according to "copy" and workers need to return on the following day (ie, food, rest, shelter, clothes etc). ), Not the value of the workers participating in the raw materials

In all modern economic theories Marxist economic systems are based on moral principles, but capitalism focuses only on profit and profitability. Marxism is interested in equitable distribution of wealth and fair use of production means. Marxism is focused on the victims of exploitation imposed by minorities, but it also focuses on the fate of the working class, the majority - and the fate of poverty and poverty. For these reasons, this system appeals to me, but it seems fair. I have recently read articles on articles that the Pope 's Supreme Court pointed out some good aspects of Marxism.