Marx, Weber and Religion

The religion defined by the Australian High Court is a complex of faith and practice that refers to an understanding of the set of values ​​that "can be inherently or functionally studied" and the meaning of existence (Berger 1974: 126). ) Substantial research on religion is mainly in the field of theology, focused on defining the existence of religious beliefs, their historical correctness and supernatural entities (Holmes, Hughes & Julian 2007: 425) .

Marx and Weber believe that religion is essential for the development of capitalism, but this "tool" has different influences on individuals and society as a whole. In his criticism against Hegel Marx showed that people created religion, and religion makes all unfilled hopes and dreams people want to achieve or express in nature and society themselves For his (life) life force structure to reflect. Therefore, religion is created as a kind of thing.

Discussions between Weber and Marx are developing around the role of religion. Marx believes that religion is "popular opium" and this drug passively accepted the fear of capitalism. However, Weber changed this adage to mind. In fact, religion is the cause and the most important supporter of capitalism. People do not tolerate capitalism for religion, they only become capitalists for their religion. According to Weber's analysis, some countries did not succeed capitalism because they did not feel anxious or guilty, but they were full of trust in miracles. Stealing is acceptable. To enrich the family, the community supports the clan exceeding the country.

Marx and Weber are concerned about the origin and development of modern capitalism. For Weber, religion, especially Protestantism (Calvinism), is a major but non-exclusive cause and influence factor in the development of modern capitalism. For Marx, capitalism is the result of real material conditions as well as other historical production methods, and religion is part of society's upper structure (and hence the material base of historical decisions Above). For Weber, thinking seems to create social change, and for Marx, causality is opposite, they are only the result of material condition. For Weber, religion can be the driving force for social change, and for Marx it must be conservative, and the current situation remains strong.