Margaret Chase Smith’s “Declaration of Conscience”

In the "Declaration of Conscience", Margaret · Chase Smith gave a speech to American citizens and US Senator in political turmoil. Communist criticism and 'fear of the state' stimulated this speech. Even in this upcoming election, the Republicans will decide the new female Senator to speak generally, that was not common at the time. In this article, I will explain "conscience declaration" to prove the credibility as Margaret · Chase · Smith as a female politician.

On June 1, 1950, Senator Margaret Chase Smith Republic of Maine spoke at the Senate and called her "conscience declaration". In a clear attack against McCarthyism she called for the end of the "personal assassination" and said that "some basic principles of Americanism: the right to criticize, the right to unwelcome beliefs, the right to protest, the independence Right to think ". She said, "Freedom of speech is not like the past in the United States," he accused him of doubting all attitudes, not knowing anything about "cancer tentacles." Six other Republican Senators - Wayne Morse, Owen M Ives, Charles W. Toby, Edward John, George Aiken, Robert C. Hendrickson join Smith and condemn McCarthy's strategy

In the "Declaration of Conscience", Margaret · Chase Smith gave a speech to American citizens and US Senator in political turmoil. Communist criticism and 'fear of the state' stimulated this speech. Even in this upcoming election, the Republicans will decide the new female Senator to speak generally, that was not common at the time. In this article we will explain the "conscience declaration" to prove the credibility of Margaret · Chase · Smith as a woman.

As Senator of Maine State, Margaret Chase Smith opposed Joseph McCarthy and was the first person to split the parliament. More than four years later, Senator McCarthy finally stopped being accused. Margaret Chase Smith's conscience declaration has a message, and so is today. We need all delegates to act independently as she is. The cardinal presidential election appealed to many voters in his independent style, and he wanted to look blue and red. I need to listen right now. Regardless of the contents of the party, why can not we actively cooperate?