Making Moral Decisions: The Synergistic-Reflective-Equilibrium Model

Collaboration - Reflection - Equilibrium Model Abstract: This paper is to understand why people can not agree with moral grounds and why moral pluralism is the logical element of moral reality . Cooperative - Reflection - Equilibrium model is a model that explains how people make ethical decisions as multi agents. If the model is correct, it will not be a new discovery but a new explanation of how diverse agents make ethical decisions.

Introduction Moral theory helps doctors prove and reflect on the moral decisions they have made. Moral theory is different from other theories. They help to prove that we make moral decisions, but they are often unpredictable. There are several reasons to be cautious about moral theory, but they also have great potential to enrich critical reflections on our decisions. Utilitarianism, Cantism, Virtue theory, four principles, and sophistication:

Susan Anderson said their work was influenced by philosophers John Rawls and W. Ross. Rolls' article on "reflecting equilibrium" states that ethical decisions in certain situations can be drawn from ethical decisions, but Ross believes that human beings have some early moral obligations ing. We are obligated to bear these initial obligations, but they are not absolute, nor do they automatically cover others. Therefore, when inconsistencies arise, it is necessary to balance each other and weigh the weight.

I will use the contemplation and equilibrium process to clarify the impact of the set of new environments for our ethical principles - the global governance body -. Reflection equilibrium method always relies on some hypothetical background moral theory, but it is "design that is useful for motivating change of accepted moral wisdom" and our uncertain situation, situation and phenomena Background theory and intuitive judgment combined with empirical facts believe that the norms and principles we were inappropriate for the environment are in this case suitable for the original Considering whether it is possible to actually see "being triggered". Reason for setting

In 1991 Professor Washington University professor Thomas M. Jones criticized many of the existing ethical decision models. He introduced a variable called moral strength and designed a new model that improved earlier efforts by laying the foundation for its research in social psychology. Moral strength takes into account several factors: the magnitude of the results, the social consensus, the possibility of influence, the immediacy of time and the concentration of influence. Jones wrote that even in the face of the same ethical decision, the two may correctly make different decisions due to these factors. In fact, not all decisions are the same. Companies that introduce dangerous new projects are more morally focused than deciding to remove names of others from group projects. Both are unethical decisions, but either one has a greater impact than the other.