In the novel Lynn Hunt invented "human rights", which focused clearly on all kinds of events that create criticism and discussion of the definition of human rights. "If the right of equality is so self-evident it will only be done at a certain time and place, why, why, why do we need to do this discussion?" She asked the question, her question was ideal. If why someone involved in 'humanitarian' is entitled to equal rights, the so-called obvious things must be discussed and debated.
University of California, in the history of the civil rights movement in 2007, Los Angeles History Professor Lynn Hunt provided information for Shelley's idealism and invented the human rights movement. When Hunter led the people transcending the popular novels of European popular novels of the 18th century, the subjects transcending the old class framework points of view are indispensable, instead of that "ordinary person", royalty and aristocracy Especially when it came to take, he said that it broke out. Being a friend is worthy of sympathy and recognition. Living with imagination on the skin of different characters may interfere with stereotypes and cruelty, as well as abstract moral systems. Therefore, Hunt believes that the spread of literature has a potential impact on the dissemination of human rights alliances.
There are many documents in the history of human rights. California (university, 1987: three books are widely cited, modern human rights were born in the 1970s, not in the 1940s, James W. Nickel, "philosophical reflection of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights" human consciousness Elizabeth · Vogwort, "The World of New Deal: The Human Rights Vision of the United States" (Harvard University, 2007); and Costas Daginas, Human Rights and Empires: Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Lautledge, 2007 ). In "Human rights invention", Lynn Hunt, who is trying to create deep accessibility in the past, said that the origins of the modern human rights movement were placed in the French and American revolution in the 18th century
To some extent, the universality of human rights depends on its origins. Moral standards such as human rights can be formed in two ways. They may be invented only by human beings, or they may need to be shown or discovered by humans. If human rights are just inventions, it is hard to say that all societies and governments should be detained without agreeing to it. However, it is easy to assert universality if human rights are independent of the creation of mankind. However, this independent moral standard may occur in two ways, if they were created by God, or they are the essence of human beings and societies inherent to humans. Unfortunately, both routes are generating large traps. Another source of defense that can be universally is acceptance of human rights as a natural right that everyone can infer from the essence of people and people's society.