Lower the Drinking Age

At the age of 18, I finally become an adult. They join the army, vote, purchase tobacco and tobacco products, tattoo, and even die for our country. Everyone thinks this person is an adult, but they are not big enough to buy or drink yet. People can be responsible for sending their lives, earning their own money, paying their bills, but they are still not old enough to purchase or consume alcohol. Reducing the drinking age to 18 will help prevent crime and personal injury due to alcohol abuse.

There was controversy over the fact that the US should reduce the age of drinking to 18 years. An 18 year old child should have the right to drink alcohol. 18 years old is regarded as an adult but inviting overeating leads to an increase in fatalities and alcohol damage. Brain cells, especially the body itself. Reducing the age of drinking to 18 years is beneficial for the manager.

Reducing the age of drinking alcohol is considered a major problem in today's society. Especially young people between 18 and 21 years old. This raises the question of whether to reduce the age of drinking. If you lower the statutory drinking age to 18 years old, there is a positive and negative impact on society. Actively raise government taxes to protect high school students and young college students from the custom of drinking alcohol law. Negative; ... Chlorine is added as a disinfectant to drinking water and removes harmful bacteria. Harmful bacteria are usually found in areas where water is available. The controversy over this problem is that chlorination can be a pros and cons of consumers. Chlorine is currently the most effective water treatment method compared to other options

There are many reasons to lower the age of drinking. Finance tends to be one of them. The numbers mentioned here are very speculative, but at least I would like you to show that reducing the drinking age is more cost effective, even if the state loses federal highway funds . Even though most of these numbers have no results, I think the final result will be very different. By increasing the duty of drunk driving and drunk driving, society can even recover a relatively large net loss.