When I encounter ethical concepts through natural selection, they usually come from social biologists who believe that evolutionism has written moral principles in our brains - indeed, I think that the similarity of these views is I do not think it is coincidence. Both are looking for an external writer of our morals. Therefore, the ethics of natural selection sees that certain moral principles are biologically / genetically related to brain / consciousness through the natural selection process.
Because our moral sense is probably built from previous moral teachings, it is a product of countless moral reflections over many years, and it becomes active when introducing scenes. Our morals are activated by considering the scenario we have to respond to. When this moral mindset is activated and ultimately provides us output, this reaction is a product of a system that has no reason to believe that we should be wrong. An interesting thing about moral intuition is that I just explained them as empirical phenomena. But if this is true, their empiricism is a strange type: they are empirical truths that you can find by sitting in an armchair instead of going to the world for investigation; they are your heart only You can use the experience to experience not your senses
Researchers in moral psychology sometimes find it difficult to prove that in our moral instincts we use at least four different deeply-emotional states, all of which have evolutionary effects. Respect for loyalty and authority. Given the unique history of Jews, common tragedies and victories, explain why many Jews feel urgent enough to express themselves as true moral requirements, why it is not so difficult to explain Please give me. Even if such orders conflict with their wider secular views, they will project beyond yourself
To be moral it is necessary for Hull to think that "moral beliefs: ... have moral goodness in our hearts and moral beliefs in other worlds". Ability has changed within itself, "The outside world is a place where happiness is linked to a morally sound life." Another way to propose the second condition is to say "moral people need to believe that they do not have to do bad things morally to be happy." When we do that, it will be very tragic, and we can not try to become moral. Halle believes that the "moral belief" necessary to lead a moral life will require believing in the god that it can guide the world in such a way that (final) virtue and happiness unite It is.