Logging on Public Land Must be Restricted

As I was walking on a small street passing through the white oak and other mixed hardwood canopies, I quickly arrived at a small rock cliff overlooking it. Mark · Twain National Forest. But when I turned my head, the green canvas looked like a patchwork quilt. One square mile of forest, another square mile excluding stumps and slashes is a clear waste of logging. Loggers take what they need and leave, allowing nature to take over from the beginning where they left.

It is a material. One scenario involves the government's ability to restrict the use of private land and the other scenario involves unused forest logging. The viewpoint of the environment and anti-environment is written in the same way as much as possible. Since each scene refers to the opposite position, the student 's response reflects that the position stands out rather than ignoring other positions, rather than other positions. The detection patterns in the two scenarios are basically the same, but some of the impacts have only a significant impact on one of the two. As my interest lies in finding ways to think about general environmental problems, its impact is important in certain circumstances, and is discussed only if it is important for at least another situation.

One of the politicians' favorite reactions to destructive forest fires is the demand for increased logging in public land. Their reason is that fewer trees will stop the fire. The truth is that logging does not eliminate forest fires. For example, the fuel remains felled, some of which can spread the flame faster than the forest area, making the ignition trap, dry combustible vegetation, and flame propagation by air burning easier can do. One mile of fire

In a new study before the fire is being investigated that a small waterfall fire in the western part of Douglas County is burned in both public and private land boards using various methods of logging and forest protection. The results of the survey indicate that farms afforested in private land (to some extent public land) exacerbate the danger of fire while mature forests that are more common in public land tend to have higher fire resistance and fire resistance It strongly suggests. . This result best describes the fact that tree cultivation with short crop rotation maintains a high proportion of landscape under younger conditions and the fuel load near the ground remains high. On the other hand, natural forests have large trees, thick barks, tall trees, towering torches, and more complicated fuel distribution, making it difficult to get through fire, except extreme weather.