Living the Orwellian Nightmare: New Media and Digital Dystopia

This article provides academic criticism of the new media culture compared with George Orwell's "1984". The authors believe that some plot elements of "1984" are reflected in modern Western society. Express these similar factors as a result of the new media technology. The government of the real world has adopted new media technology to dominate in a manner comparable to the fictional "brothers" of Orwell. The author first describes social and political patterns in Orwell 's written novels. The next section will introduce the latest ways in which government agencies use new media technologies as monitoring tools. The author believes that the US government uses new media technology as a propaganda tool. Through the use of new media, the United States is trying to limit the ability of people to reject their stories. In the last section, the authors detail how new media technologies can contribute to the destruction of language and knowledge. The authors conclude that the negative effects of new media technology can only be improved through critical thinking.

Seminar Journal PO Box 204, Didcot, Oxford, OX 11 9 ZQ, UK. Tel: + 44-1235-818-062; Fax: + 44-1235-817-275; email: subscriptions@symposium-journals.co.uk; Website: http: //www.wwwords.co.uk/elea

2 Jonathan Raban: The New York Times commented on Sunday, January 7, 2017. Laban is the author of Surveillance, a set of annoying distant fantasy in the Seattle area. There, he evokes the nightmare of the Orwell style police state who immediately occupies us. (Jonathan Raban, Surveillance (New York: Vintage Books, 2006)). 6 Senate Republican leader Mitch · McConnell has announced this mission for Congress Republicans. Nation and The Undercurrent received a record of a secret strategy meeting called "American courage: our responsibility to free society" by Moch McConnell 's conservative millionaires and billionaires donors It was. In a Q & A session saying "Freedom of expression: defending the right of first amendment" at the meeting on June 15, Mr. Maconelle said: This means that we can hand spending bills

First of all, who said "prohibition" or "review"? Waiver of freedom of speech wants to abandon these terms. It is causing an Orwell-like disorder suppressed by a large government. I will never claim such fainting. I never suggest "prohibit", "review" or not to intervene by the government. I am talking about my (and perhaps others) making personal decisions and expressly refusing to accept intentional transgender fear expression (and other hatred expression) . I can say these opinions, challenge their beliefs, refuse to contact them, and discuss them publicly with people who criticize or condemn them. Please remind other people about their behavior and persuade others not to tolerate them.