Literature Review: Open Visitations in ICU Oksana Bjorlie Walden University Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice

Literature Review: The ICU open access survey shows that an open ICU visit is an asset rather than an obstacle to the patient's health. Since the 1950s access has changed from a strict nurse management system to a more flexible patient-centered approach (Taylor, 2008, p. 30). Family participation in patient care has evolved into a cooperative model between patients, families, and health care providers. In response to this collaboration between patients and family-centered medicine (PFCC), this approach is encouraged to achieve the most beneficial results for patients and their families.

The subject of this review was selected based on observations in clinical practice; for example, the ongoing sputum evaluation of the ICU is rare, and conversations with intensive care nurses thereafter strengthen awareness of conflicting ICU monitoring methods did. In order to solve this clinical problem, the theme of the ICU fantasy was selected as the main research subject of this research. In order to create a relevant and structured review question, we need to investigate the literature related to this clinical problem.

The concepts of policies and practices based on evidence in international development are also emphasized. For example, in literature reviews focused on development, the use of evidence and data in decision-making to provide information for development decisions is integrated, participatory, structured, and integrated with respect to improved results It is strong.

The research literature and our research participants are consistent in explaining how evidence gives information on educational policy and practice. Similar to literature review, respondents' research shows that evidence is an important element in decision-making. Both literature review and our research point out an increase in the use of data, a form of evidence. Part of the reason is that one field not found in the research literature is "proof of research failure" described by the research participants. In short, they not only need to know what goes well (evidence of effective planning and practice), but nothing goes wrong (the evidence shows invalid procedures and practices) Can be avoided.

This research aims to research and summarize the literature based on published information such as magazines, articles and books. The purpose of this review is to determine best practice evidence for testing cancer patients. Literature review will guide you through understanding of research plans and results. (Barnes & Gloves 2009). It is based on research problems, difficult patient behavior and good care strategies (Emold et al. 2011). Inclusion criteria include all publications based on a superior care management program to alleviate difficult patient behavior and patient stress and anxiety. The strength of the evidence is based on the level of evidence in a randomized controlled trial, and meta-analysis is considered to be the best evidence if primary sources of information are available. Other levels of research and evidence are included in evidence that is not proved so strongly.