From a literary point of view, "cloud atlas" definitely has polarity. Mitchell is a great writer, but his prose is always a graduate level. As the reader uses terms like "amanuensis" you can not enjoy this work - it is noteworthy that a comprehensive understanding of art and mythology is necessary. Sometimes this will be excessive - the hero of Mitchell probably should use more spoken languages โโ- but it is still a beautiful novel. However, it is definitely not a light reading
Cloud Atlas's David Mitchell (Fiction, 2004). There are different Mitchel styles - a complex world in which everything is secretly involved, paranoia is completely reasonable. Cloud Atlas is his best, especially in the middle chapter, when he invests in a new dialect that essentially depicts the life of devastating times. (Sullivan) Elizabeth Moon, Speed โโof Darkness (Fiction, 2002). The hero is a scientist with autism in the near future world where his condition may be "healed". Quotation marks are one of the core questions related to whether autism is a condition that actually needs to be cured. When reading this article, I do not think I have heard about the concept of neural diversity, but that is exactly what I think. (Eup)
I like cloud atlas, I thought of trying other books from Mitchell. Unlike Cloud Atlas, this tells of multiple narrators across multiple continents, unlike Cloud Atlas, this is usually done in a short time, the story is more clearly related. In an article I read about real-time translations only for the first large-scale use of the Nuremberg trial, I think I will learn more about them because I do not know much about them. Clearly, these stories are very tragic, it is difficult to understand this industry-wide suffering and death. However, Russell did a good job to gain insight about the defendant's role and behavior. (Amazon)