List of archaeological periods

The name of the archeology era in the list of archeology periods varies from region to region. This is a list of major departments by continent and region. Dating is also very different, giving a wide range generalized approximation.

The systems of the three era have been used in many fields, referring to the prehistoric times and historical era determined by the manufacture and use of the tools of the Stone Age, the Bronze Age and the Iron Age. As these ages are characterized by technological developments, it is natural that the dates of these references differ in different parts of the world. In many areas, the term "stone age" has been replaced by more specific geological era and is no longer used. In some areas, an intermediate charcoal period is required between the stone age and the Bronze Age. For less cultures using indigenous tools, other classifications such as bedrock period, ancient times and formation period refer to the development of other types of technology and social organization.

The historical period shows the period of human development and has the advantage of writing development. Recorded records tend to provide more socio - political insights to major countries, thus enabling classification by dominant empire and culture such as Hellenism, Rome, Viking etc. The definitions of these periods are inevitably relevant only to the field of empires and cultures.

Industrial or modern times are generally considered to refer to the period since the 1800s. Since then the industrial revolution that began in Western Europe has brought world trade and greatly enhanced cultural exchange.

NB Australian archeology is usually categorized before European settlement (before 1788) and before historical (from 1788 onward), but in the sense that Australians have strong history but have no history It is controversial. Oral tradition

The early archaeological records of the Paleolithic Period seemed to lack evidence of complicated social behavior spread throughout the Paleolithic and Sokchi era archeology. This is a consistent pattern whether or not it is related to H. erectus, ancient H. sapiens, H. Neanderthalensis or an anatomical modern person. There was no art in the early stages of the Old Stone Age. Several artifacts with no obvious practical value were known from this time (Bednarik 1992), but these artifacts either cut grass into the bone support or unconscious by-products such as late products of the product It is most likely to be. - Deposition process, or bite by predator (Davidson 1992; Chase & Dibble 1987, 1992). There are neither figurative art nor regular repeat images that may constitute symbolic codes like the beginning of the Paleolithic Age in Southwest Europe (Delluc & Delluc 1978).

Welcome to the Levantine Archaeological Laboratory at the University of California, San Diego. The laboratory focuses on the archaeological investigation of the social evolution of southern Levanto from Neolithic to Islamic. Many of the data we analyzed were derived from excavations in Jordan and Israel. However, India is doing some exciting modern ethnic archeology to help build the past model. Currently, the laboratory's main field activities focus on the role of ancient mining and metallurgy in social change in the Faynan area of ​​southern Jordan in the iron age (1200 - 500 BC).

This course study is currently available for archaeological knowledge in ancient North Africa, the Sahara Desert and sub-Saharan Africa. The focus will be archeology in the late Stone Age, Iron Age and colonial era. The goal is to firmly grasp tremendous changes in modern African history and provide students with information on some of the most important archaeological sites on Africa, discovery and research. Through the curriculum, one theme is the change in the role of past politics and archeological practice in Africa.