Liberty of Verbal Expression

James Stuart Mill advocated a harmless principle on On Liberty and introduced two different fields that make up life. These areas are private and open. When there is the largest private area, decision-making is good for individuals, so you will find a meaningful life. The history and social background of democracy provides a background for such a revolutionary background to the principle of innocence. Language damage can only occur if the result is immediate physical damage, so harmless principles can be applied to freedom of speech.

Since freedom of speech is freedom of expression without restrictions on speech, thought and way of life, we can freely participate in so-called "life experiment" by John Stuart Mill. Faith and thought, writing or other freedom of communication medium. The first serious problem was that Mr. Donald Trump was asked to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution" because he took over as President on January 20, 2017. ..... deprivation of freedom of speech and press freedom "; Trump has posted this message on February 17, 2017:

The Constitution provides freedom to all. Freely includes certain rights that allow people to define and express their own identity in the legal domain. In such a case, the petitioner will seek freedom by marrying people of the same sex and treating their marriage as legitimate under the same conditions as marriage between heterosexuals. These incidents are from Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, and marriage is defined as a combination of male and female. See, for example, Mich. See Const. , Art. I, § 25; Ky.Const. § 233 A; Ohio Priest Code Security. § 3101.01 (Lexis 2008); Tenn. , Art. XI, § 18. The petitioner is a homosexual couple with 14 men with the same sex partner and two who died. Respondents are state officials responsible for enforcing the relevant laws.

As you can imagine, most conflicts are not negative freedom but positive freedom. For example, most of us promise to avoid state management for speech without any problems. But in reality, does some people have media megaphones, others have the potential to influence public opinion and draw attention from elected officials? We can not deny that unequal access to media and civil servants due to ownership, advertisement, campaign contributions will affect democracy. And now, few people seem very active.