Levels of Processing in Cognitive Approach

Level of processing in the cognitive approach Once given a list of words to learn, one of three can be done so that you can recall them later. You can usually try to learn the visual method which is just a word. You can think of rhyming words with words to learn This is an auditory method. Finally, you can associate these words with other words in the car or driving. This is a semantic way to remember things. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- Craik and Lockhart have conducted the following investigations to investigate which type of memory is best remembered.

The memory research framework that is very relevant to this research is the processing method of Craik and Lockhart (1972). This theoretical view thinks that human recognition includes a hierarchical hierarchical process called "depth of processing", where "depth" means more sophisticated semantic or cognitive analysis. More specifically, Craik and Lockhart (1972) argued that the persistence of memory traces is a function of depth of analysis and that deeper analysis is associated with more complex, long lasting, stronger traces It is. Therefore, retention is not the main speed of analysis, but a function of depth. According to this view, memory can be viewed as a continuum of durable products, from sensory analysis of transient products to semantically related operations.

There are two basic ways to study stereotypes: cognitive process methods and socio-cultural methods. Cognitive methods investigate the nature of stereotypes and their role in the perception of individuals and groups (Allport 1954). In this theoretical tradition, the study of Tajfel (1978a, 1978b) and Sherif (1966, 1967) argues that social identity came from members of the group, and individual group members Was evaluated. Regarding these identities. Therefore, the ethnocentric aspect of stereotypes is considered to be the main evidence based on the recognition of individual external groups. It is due in part to the general motivation to distinguish groups from external groups. To Definition