Letter: Vote in November; vote yes on Proposition 10

Larry DePuy can understand what he said in a recent letter to Proposal 10 ("Vote for Proposal 10, Taxation on Rich", Times-Standard, 25th September, pp. A4). In fact, some owners rely on their rental income to compensate for their retirement. Unfortunately, the propaganda of Proposition 10 was intentionally misleading. Proposition 10 * Do not automatically run rent stabilization. It precludes the approval that the state passed in 1995, that is, the unit built after 1996 can not manage rent. Their community

Indeed, Costa Hawkins solved housing shortages at the request of contractors and real estate agents. As rents continue to rise, we are committed to the rapidly growing housing market. Twenty years later, we can see that the promise did not go well. Now those who have more money at Wall Street are trying to tell us the same thing.

In 2016, I held "Make a measure V" campaign to suppress the rent growth of the housing community of Humber County manufacturing industry. Voters will respond accordingly and provide the stability necessary for elderly people, veterans, disabled people to stay in the community. You provide the necessary support for families to bring up their children and their families. Now I would like to vote for you first, in November, then vote on the proposition 10

Proposition 67 - I dislike this measure. This is a national referendum, not a ballot request. Therefore, "Yes" voted to support the law passed the ban on the use of plastic bags at the grocery store, "No" voted to reject it and abolish it. In other words, the "yes" vote means no change and the "no" vote overrides the existing law. This is crazy and wrong. But this is on the ballot paper. I think the principle was abandoned but eventually I will agree with the ban (regarding marine organisms rather than climate change, the reason - for my knowledge, the mathematics of carbon emissions between plastic and reusable bags is It is unstable). I decided to vote.

On November 8, after deciding who to vote, we will consider the proposition over time and vote for proposition 58. It is also known as the law (learning) that acquires and prepares language education. This proposition wants to abolish the proposition 227 adopted in California in 1998, with the sole purpose of replacing bilingual education in California and using English as the only language of the school. Proposition 58 allows parents and school districts to decide on the best way to teach English to students with limited English proficiency. This argument makes it easier for schools to implement bilingual education. Students who speak different languages ​​can learn not only English, but only English-speaking monolingual students can learn other languages.