Tragic experience: The world of tragedy that will be a classic tragedy is written by French named Victor Hugo. Les Miserable was set during the French Revolution and showed life to the reader through the eyes of a former prisoner [Valjean] trying to correct his wrong behavior just right. Les Miserable is not classical. It's cute, unfair, a bit pure and not sincere, and it has different opinions, but on the contrary it is real. First of all, one of the reasons why Les Miserable is not classical is due to Hugo's wonderful writing style.
Is it illegal to infringe on this right? In the classic novel "Les Miserables", the family of Jean Valjean fell into poverty in France in the 19th century and his nephew was slowly starving to death. In order to save the life of his nephew, Jean stole a loaf of bread from wealthy rich. This is a typical moral dilemma: in this case is theft tolerated? We can discuss both sides. Supporters may say that the good result for him and his family is very big - his nephew's life has been saved - the negative impact on the rich are relatively small - he has so much You may have food There was never to miss it, if he did, he was able to send his servant to the bakery to buy another one. Therefore, theft brings good results
In the novel "Les Miserables", the writer Victor Hugo emphasizes that society is the cause of human evil. The tragic world is based on Jean Valjean, a poor who was arrested for stealing bread to feed his sister's hungry baby. Valjean was sentenced to 20 years in prison as committing a crime, when he was released he was avoided for the past, and he had already paid too much. Society rejects him at any time for his past crimes and will not excuse him for his actions. In this case, Hugo shows the cruelty of the "civilized" world. This world steals bread to feed children and infinitely prejudices men.