Leibniz’s Monadology and Observed Phenomena

Agreement between Leibniz 's monograph and observation phenomena as I read Gottfried Leibniz' s "single theory", I observed his physical interpretation of the structure and science of the physical world, mathematics and nature. The way the phenomenon matches is shocked. First, we show agreement between Leibniz and science. Next, I show a match with his math. Finally, we use the first two arguments to show the consistency of Leibniz with nature observations.

An important aspect of Leibniz 's "monism" and "metaphysical discourse" is the concept of his simplicity and interaction. Leibniz gives the word monad to all simple substances. A monad is part of a creature "whether it is stretched, not shaped, whether it can not be separated" (M3). A monad can exist as a clear, necessary, limited, or infinite presence. - The main feature I am missing is confidence. In my opinion, others are always smarter, more beautiful, motivated, and superior to me than I am. Because of this attitude, I usually do not express opinions, express my thoughts, or control something.

Agreement between Leibniz 's monograph and observation phenomena as I read Gottfried Leibniz' s "single theory", I observed his physical interpretation of the structure and science of the physical world, mathematics and nature. The way the phenomenon matches is shocked. First, we show agreement between Leibniz and science. Next, I show a match with his math. - The theory of computer use in chaos discusses chaos as unpredictable behavior in real systems because chaos is very sensitive to the initial environment. Chaos appears in the active system. If two very close starting points diverge even a little or even a little, their future behavior is ultimately unpredictable. Since every change in the system changes over time, small changes in the starting point can result in very different results.

Leibniz's story is often not discussed, which mainly means that it is a random fantasy. As David Wiggins did not unreasonably respond to my defense attempt, "But in Monadology Leibniz did not give any reason to what he said." As someone was led by Leibniz, he seemed to say everything necessary. Difficulty seems to be a series of different ideas that may be better, how to use things, things, truths, knowledge in standard languages ​​(and in Leibniz case, after 300 years the development of science It seems to have led the way). Interestingly, some people, including Russell and James, think that Leibniz may prove it is correct, although it is not wrong, unless only one person can see what he truly meant It was