Learning styles- Theory of Multiple Intelligences and its Effectiveness in the Classroom

Most people think that all students have the same idea and should be equally graded. According to Gardner (2011), the only opinion of intelligence is that "everyone has more or less a single general ability; it can be defined or measured through standardized oral appliances" (page xxviii) . These ideas will cause problems if everyone truly has the same idea. If the test can accurately measure someone's intelligence and help them adapt to society as a whole.

3 Adaptive Learning Style / Multiple Intelligence Multiple Intelligence In cognitive theory students learn, remember, do and understand in various ways including various intelligence such as music rhythm, visual space, language - language, logic - mathematics, body etc. We are assuming. - Kine, interpersonal relationship, interpersonal relationship and naturalism. As a cognitive theory, learning style / multi intelligence is controversial, but teachers in the classroom have proved to be able to nurture various interests, provide diversity and diversity, and nurture the whole child.

Learning style is different from Gardner's multiple intelligence theory, which claims that people can be skillful in various ways and perform different skills. Types of intelligence in this theory include linguistics, kinematics, visual spatial science, music science, interpersonal relationships, interpersonal relationships, mathematical logic, and naturalism. As you can see, there are similarities between the type of intelligence and the way people learn information most effectively. People with specific abilities and intelligence can learn best in some way. For example, an English teacher has strong linguistic intelligence, enjoy reading and writing, and confident in language skills such as learning languages ​​and grasping meaning of unfamiliar words. Whatever kind of new information you learn, the learning style that he or she prefers may be visual and lonely.

Most importantly, the learning style emphasizes individual learning processes and Gardner's content-oriented multi-intelligence model is surprisingly complementary. Without theory of multiple intelligence, that style is very abstract, often underestimating the context. Without learning style, multiple intelligence theory prove that it is impossible to describe processes of different thinking and emotion. Each theory corresponds to the weakness of other theories; they together form a comprehensive picture of wisdom and difference.