Leadership in Aberdeen and Green River

In the leadership of Aberdeen and Green River, I have studied the leadership and communication process of Aberdeen and Green River. I will explain whether working groups and teams work in Green River. Then explain the differences in leadership between the two facilities and explain how to implement Green River changes to meet Aberdeen's leadership skills. Next, I will explain the differences in the communication process between the two facilities and explain whether I can effectively use Aberdeen's unique communication with Green River.

FMC Green River, one of FMC's plants, is currently experiencing difficulties in terms of plant efficiency and effectiveness compared to other FMC plants, particularly FMC Aberdeen. Although FMC Green River has been in operation for many years, it was replaced by FMC Aberdeen, a younger company, from the viewpoint of reducing profitability and operating costs. FMC Green River and FMC Aberdeen differ in management direction and plant operation method. However despite these differences, FMC Green River still faces the problem of inefficient plant operation compared to FMC Aberdeen. In this regard, FMC Green River manager Ken Daily has decided to investigate the possibility of using some of the management principles used in FMC Aberdeen's business over the past few years.

FMC Aberdeen's extensive hiring process is enthusiastic about providing professional and skilled workers to the factory and taking measures to improve the productivity of the entire factory. On the other hand, the direction of FMC Green River is against FMC Aberdeen. Even though a small number of workers can do the same job with the same level of quality, there is no sense of collective effort and teamwork on the FMC Green River floor, there are more workers in the work area . In addition, salaries of FMC Green River are relatively high compared to other FMC plants throughout the United States. Combining this fact with the information that the work area of ​​FMC Green River can be run by a few people seems to be the reason for poor performance. They said that the workers paid from the facts are not actually contributing to the company as a whole.