I have to admit that I was a little shocked by the article "My lazy American student" by a part-time professor at Babson University, Kara Miller, and I am obviously not the only ones. This article, published at Boston Globe in December, caused positive comments and negative comments. Inside Higher Ed. Earlier this month, not only emphasized Miller's original article but also a summary article was presented announcing the subsequent articles she wrote after having published so many comments. Inside Higher Ed also published an abstract of articles written by Babson students in the United States (also published by The Globe) and the dean's answer on his blog.
Babson College is undoubtedly a unique place. As Babson 's former admissions officer, especially on campus there are so many international students that it is easy to compare Babson international students and domestic students. However, it is easy to put the students in a stereotype group, so I think that this judgment is unfair for every student. According to my experience, each student is different, I think it is more difficult to classify the group of students than the next group of students. I respect Miller's rights to her views and views, but it is difficult to understand that unless an American student wishes to prove himself that it is comfortable in the class.
First of all, because of the threat of stereotypes, we recognize that stereotypes exist and influence students. Hispanic laziness, Asian Americans are good at mathematics, women do not do well for science and mathematics, and African Americans do not go well with standardized tests. The threat of a stereotype is like a self-fulfilling prophecy. Students will meet or be less than expected. Next, we ignore this problem and will not solve it. Sadly, this is often the case. In the eyes of the student, the teacher makes racist speech in the classroom undoubted - it is accepted implicitly. Social isolation tends to occur. why? We actively promote it by not asking for other methods
I have to admit that I was a little shocked by the article "My lazy American student" by a part-time professor at Babson University, Kara Miller, and I am obviously not the only ones. This article, published at Boston Globe in December, caused positive comments and negative comments. Inside Higher Ed. Earlier this month, not only emphasized Miller's original article but also a summary article was presented announcing the subsequent articles she wrote after having published so many comments. Inside Higher Ed also published an abstract of articles written by Babson students in the United States (also published by The Globe) and the dean's answer on his blog.
I have to take this somewhat cryptic article; I know another experienced teacher who thinks American students are generally "lazy" - she went to Europe many times, There is educational relations in Europe - herself it is a talented student, working hard at two good schools. I will acquire a bachelor's degree and a master's degree.
One of the most frustrating aspects of teaching is communication with "lazy" students. A lazy student can be defined as a student who never realizes his possibility because he has chosen not to do the necessary work to maximize his or her ability while transcending intelligence. Most teachers will tell you that it is better not to be a lazy and mighty group of students but to work hard on a group of students working hard. It is very important for the teacher to thoroughly evaluate the child before the child is called "idle". Through this process, the teacher may find that there are more things that happen besides simple laziness. Equally important, they do not mark them publicly. Doing so will have sustained adverse effects and will last throughout your life. Instead, teachers must constantly teach them the skills they need to defend their students and overcome obstacles that prevent them from maximizing their possibilities.