Laws Restricting the Paparazzi

Paparazzi - It is a fusion of Italian papa touch, gnat and razzi mean flash burst. It is also known as active photography. The word "paparazzi" was made by Federico Fellini who gave the name of a social photographer for hunting in the movie "La Dolce Vita" in 1959. The paparazzi photographer was moved by a large amount of funds from the tabloid publisher. They try to catch wealthy famous people in a situation where they can not welcome. After the watergate incident scandal broke out for the first time in Washington DC, a new generation of journalism has made dramatic progress (Petersen's, 57).

There is a long-term tension between famous people and people who want to record these reputations. Since the reputation of paparazzi is annoying, there are many states and countries that enforce laws and regulations to reduce the tension between photographers and their theme. However, in the United States, celebrity media is protected by the first amendment. In California, regardless of parents, the state passed a law to protect children 's famous people from harassing paparazzi in 2013.

Since there is no strict law to protect celebrities from paparazzi, paparazzi thinks the privacy of celebrity children's invasion is okay. What happens when paparazzi are interested in these celebrity children? I have seen pictures of celebrity children's magazines, but I have never thought of how these parents violate paparazzi's privacy. In a pink blog I read, she took up Paparazzi and the new parent Casey (her husband), I posted personal photos of our willow tree and donated all the money to charity groups I made it. "She started blogging," Follow our car, "" Paparazzi 's behavior such as "sitting outside our house all day". That is why they made a decision. It is a person who should be able to protect the privacy of the child.

Paparazzi and the publisher's responsibility to print illegal photos do not violate the US Constitution. Even if the law generally applied conflicts with the first revision, if the law meets strict examination criteria, the law can be judged by the constitution. 250 In this test, if there is a government interest that is convincing to the law, and the scope of customization is narrow, the law will be constitutional. Result of hope. "251 The interests of the government are nothing but protecting the government's direct safety. Paparazzi tactics risk not only the safety of certain celebrities but also the safety of countless other pedestrians and car drivers who may get caught in the high speed paparazzi chase