Language Games, Writing Games - Wittgenstein and Derrida: A Comparative Study

Language Games, Burning Games - Wittgenstein and Derrida: Comparative Study Abstract: Heidegger's Doctrine Using the Concept to Change First Derida's Deconstruction "The Destruction of." Derrida's demolition, the content of text, Actions, and activities within the text. He also doubts metaphysics, embeds it in metaphysics, emphasizes our thoughts and plays a dual role of philosophy. But Wittgenstein's dismantlement is about the traditional linear mode of new reading, discussion and Zerzettelung thinking.

Clearly, the authors can compare their language game theory. Let's first compare the works of Wittgenstein and Derrida. Wittgenstein's language game must be through language and his work reflects this, but the Derrida language game needs to take the form of writing. Although they think that words / symbols have an infinite number, depending on the meaning of the word in the context, the two theorists agree that the concept of multiple meanings. Another comparison compared Foucault and Wittgenstein, they thought that we were limited by the language, we are concerned with the language we are experiencing related to the only private language game You can speak accordingly. The final comparisons are Derrida and Foucault and they are used to describe the work schedule in the form of a language control

In order to deal with this situation, Wittgenstein has developed a method to describe, imagine what he calls "language game". For Wittgenstein, the language game is a specific social activity, and the important thing is to use a specific language format. Game description Numerous languages ​​- the language of human interaction in practical use of myriad ways - "Speaking language is a form of part of life and activity" means that there is Wittgenstein So, it is an object that is not a corresponding word, but is used in "flow of life".