Language and Social Media in The Novel 1984 by George Orwell

Linguistic decomposition has been greatly influenced by the need and speed of social media, not correctly describing the emotions people are showing. George Orwell has predicted this trend by thinking itself, not by reason. As the society grows, the vocabulary will change to the most basic form, or it will be a way to keep humanity stupid. Adults themselves encourage themselves by trying to extend their hands directly to children by advertising text as if talking about adolescents or by creating themselves. Protest or talk

The popular novel by George Orwell depicts the antisocial society in 1984, the media is the king, and all the citizens of Oceania are taught to suppress their pure humanity. This novel is a warning to the citizens of the world today. Orwell's novel was designed for his readers and he realized that the media is essentially the greatest influence of losing himself. - Since the revival of the Olympic Games in 1896, the Olympic Games have gradually been affected by politics and propaganda. The purity of sportsism is endangered by scandals, corruption, commercialism, boycott, political conflict, improvement of reputation, and terrorist acts. Large-scale sports events like the Olympic Games have a strange ability not only to temporarily reunite the United Nations community but also to reflect real world competition and conflict (Grix)

1984 is George Orwell's signature, distant and novel. This is a story of Oceania, a superpower that dominates the media and reverses the truth with the opposite words. In the world where "war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is power" In the world, the work of the hero is to forge past newspaper articles, and as a result the government has a fundamental history to fulfill their needs Can be rewritten to. This terrible conspiracy theory may be true before documents are posted on the Internet. The truly horrible part is that it looks a bit like that. We all know that history was written by the victor; apparently the advisory chairman of the United States is also the truth. Is there a way to use "alternative facts" as a viable reason for doing genocide for political benefit?