Language = Personality?

Because English is essential in the United States, people are more likely to judge people through his / her English proficiency. If you speak well and are fluent, you will be respected. In other words, when you say "broken" English, they may potentially think that you are not smarter than the standard English people. But whether that person's language acquisition reflects perfect personality. It is inaccurate to judge people in the language of that person, as that language has not been officially acknowledged to represent full personality.

In the disabled community there is a discussion about "the first language" - say "disabled people" rather than "disabled people". This is because this person is not a person with disabilities but is important. However, if a person with a disability thinks that it is only "disabled", this is not a place for physically healthy people to correct this identity. They say that this is not negative people who claim they are themselves. This applies to any language. For example, in the article "On Being a Cripple" by Nancy Mairs, I am talking about calling my ID "invalid". Topic tags such as # cripplepunk and # scripthevote may be displayed on social media. These are tools designed for people with disabilities - they can use these terms. You are different.

Obviously, the way people talk shows their identity. It may not be obvious that the language plays an important role in defining the speaker's own identity. Social psychology research of language and social identity focuses mainly on three aspects. (1) the role of language as an indication of social identity, (2) the role of language in maintaining social identity, (3) the assessment of the audience's response to information. Social identity conveyed in the speech

Language is a means of communication, it plays an important role in human life; everyone has its own way of doing this. In a sense language is a personal identity of individuals and society. As part of the language discourse forms people and allows us to use past and present general language experiences. Because each word has a history of "why, who, why". Each word has a personal meaning over time, reflecting many subjective aspects, especially the identity of the speaking person. This solves the language differences that occur between gender. In this way, the answer to the question "Women and men talked in the same way" is "No".