Land Management Agency Discretion

Since the concept of the Forest Department, the discretion of the system for land management has become a problem. Gifford Pinchot assumes that local forest farmers will manage the land. Its ideas and guidelines were developed with modern science and protection in mind. Since then, the laws of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Wilderness Act, the Endangered Species Act, etc. have limited the authority and discretion of land administration to specific areas. According to the 1982 Land and Resource Management Plan based on "regulations", these laws, as well as the current forest program, can be applied to public opinion about forest programs.

In summary, the mission of these federal public-ownership agencies is to protect national natural and cultural resources in collaboration with a wide range of stakeholders, focusing on diverse applications, sustainable processes, and public access It is to protect. Regardless of the existing land management, historical protection and / or environmental protection plan, its designation is left to the president's discretion and no public input is required, so ancient laws will be applied to these major public land administration agencies It is inconsistent with.

Wildfire management, private property management, and public domain management are conducted by various forest organizations and institutions. Therefore, most of their work contributes to governance of the country. They support public land management and they play an important role in the governments of every country. National Forestry Organizations operate using geospatial data. Geographic data with spatial dimensions helps you understand the ground conditions and make strategic decisions. Spatial data is important for forest protection and forest protection planning, management, and forestry for future global forest conditions.

State land management agencies are often more cost effective administrators than federal land management bodies. The state benefits from mining, logging, grazing and entertainment activities at public site. Between 1994 and 1996, 10 Western states spent an average of $ 5.56 per dollar on state trust land, $ 42 for forest services and $ 43.43 for land management for land management. Land institutions earn much less income than state agencies, but they also exaggerate each acre. In fact, on average, the Forest Department's expenditure is more than five times the state government expenditure and the land authorities' expenditure is nearly twice the state's spending 44. that,