Kurt Vonnegut as Social Critic

Kurt Vonnegut, a social critic, is often a philosopher who writes about human circumstances, and few people are writing and understanding in complex words. But Kurt Vonnegut focuses on the same problem and offers his own personal answer as deeply as a philosopher who must receive education. He uses short sentences, less complicated vocabulary, humorous tangents and terrible stories to avoid using clumsy words of typical philosophers to express their views. In this style, Vonnegut raised the old question "How humans live in this world" in an attractive and easy-to-understand way for those who are not educated so much.

Critics often suggest that Cart Vonnegt 's novel represents a man' s despair, but it is useless to find meaning in meaningless existence. Vonnegut's novel "Slaughterhouse Five" shows this theme. The narrator that Kurt Vonnegut used is different from the main character. He uses this technique for several reasons. Kurt Vonnegut first introduced Slaughterhouse Five. But in the second chapter this narrator became a bystander. Vonnegut did this for a specific reason. He wants the reader to understand that the narrator and the hero Billy Pilgrim are two different people.

In the novel "Slaughterhouse Five", Kurt Vonnegut unified the nonlinear story using pieces of time, structure, and characters. The hero of the Vonnegut pilgrim came back and forth in his own life. As a result, Billy 's life is presented as a series of plots without a chronological order. The first information about Billy is that he will "be in time". In this sentence, Vonnegut took time from invisible to concrete, so he can now use it to satisfy his own purpose. By using the word "unstuck", Vonnegut hinted that Billy is now free. Vonnegut quickly moved Billy to let him experience some of his life. By dividing Billy's life into this, Vonegott can put together the events that more closely encompass his life.