Knowledge Is Nothing More than the Systematic Organization of Facts

The title of the truth of the introduction of fact knowledge states that "knowledge is only a systematic system of facts". Knowledge is the process by which we acquire knowledge of specific subjects, here knowledge mathematics and fields of history. Please be aware of the fact that we are arranging them in an orderly fashion. This argument poses a question of knowledge: mathematics and the organization of facts in history is part of the understanding of the knowledge they provide.

Critical thinking is that knowledge is not just a collection of facts, it is not a background, but a set of facts organized systematically. Therefore, the obvious rejection of the truth condemned by the argument is not to deny the existence of objective facts, but to reject the existence of a single true story (leotard's metanarastic). However, postmoderns can not distinguish stories. Discussers also rely on error dichotomy between "objectivity" and "subjectivity." If the story is a bad data structure, this is a bad story. However, postmodern narrative can be an excellent data structure (and more realistic than inappropriate narrative).

Combination (clear to obvious) is the process by which dominant knowledge is gathered from inside and outside the organization and then joined, edited, or processed to form more complex and systematic clear knowledge Internalization ( A clear recession is a process: "The explicit knowledge created and shared across the organization is converted to implicit knowledge by the individual, the stage can be understood as practical, knowledge is in real situation It is applied and used, and it becomes a new practice. "

Explicit knowledge is a fact that can be gathered up and disseminated in a systematic and formal language. Normally it is data, it is inside the organization and it can be easily collected. Tacit knowledge is a personal experience, context-specific knowledge, it is difficult to formalize records and expressions. It actually exists in the minds of people, behavior, and perception (Frid, 2000). For example, intuition, premonition, insight, belief, values. To achieve better performance, organizations need implicit knowledge and clear knowledge (Sanchez et al. 1996)

All organizations handle knowledge in their daily work. However, there are only a few people who have systematic and formal knowledge handling methods. Most organizations rely on personal processes and special processes. As a result, when people leave the organization they use their knowledge to lose valuable organizational assets and resources. There are many factors that an organization can motivate to establish formal and systematic knowledge management. This includes the following requests and needs.