Knowledge from the Viewpoint of Natural Science and Art

Introduction According to my understanding, knowledge is completely subjective and exists only in the minds of bystanders. Acquisition of knowledge is not only limited by observing the world carefully but also the concepts created by personal experience and the moral determination of these creations limit the acceptance of a particular pursuit It is also limited by the method. In natural science, knowledge in this field is mainly typical, production is often destroying these paradigms and therefore contradicts a wide range of perspectives, so moral judgment greatly limits how knowledge is generated .

The fields of knowledge (mathematics, natural sciences, humanities, history, religious knowledge systems, indigenous knowledge systems, arts and ethics): how to acquire their own nature and knowledge, the type of each requirement and consideration What is the problem (eg, how do scientific methods know that it is an effective way to master knowledge?), "What is the reason for learning historical knowledge, Do you apply to it? "I had knowledge in six fields of mathematics, natural science, humanities, history, art, ethics In the fall of 2014, the IB program is a knowledge system on religion and a knowledge system by indigenous people It has been changed to include two additional knowledge fields.

• Does scientific knowledge progress? Does scientific knowledge grow constantly? In this respect, how does natural science compare with other knowledge fields such as history, humanities, ethics, art, etc? Is there "an end" in science? In other words, can we gain level knowledge that all scientifically important things are known? If so, what about the results? • Can you say that most scientific research exceeds the realities and concepts of the world's daily experiences such as the nature and behavior of electromagnetic fields, elementary particles, and spatiotemporal continuum? What is the substance of a scientist? Do you have a practical interpretation model or theory (eg Higgs boson, selfish guided child), or will it be useful to predict and control the natural world? What are the actual problems of these entities that may affect scientific understanding and understanding of the public? What?