Knowing the difference between Truth and Belief

My way is always the same, axioms, my central assumption about the nature of reality, and the assumption I have.

From there, it is a long way to the definition of truth, which is different from the other noises we convey to convey the rich inner world of our hearts.

The reason why I distinguish between these concepts is that I do not understand, I do not understand, I do not understand, I know, I can not believe it because it is not true Because it may be

For me, this is my truth, but that is also the truth. Unless I understand this, I can not influence anything, so I can reliably predict what the truth is doing. Does not like

Some people confuse faith, knowledge, and truth. They have many concepts about this kind of performance, but they did not reveal why their beliefs constitute the understanding of the truth. Therefore, when they say that something is right, they will come up with an explanation consistent with their beliefs. Sometimes they may be right, but because it is possible that based on whether you can do it you do not actually know whether it will lead to a clear claim to the whole reality. faith

As usual, they may not know this is what they are doing. As usual you do not know what you do not know and you do not know you do not know it.

Is there a difference between truth and faith? How to treat things as truth without believing? Have you been told about it? If the idea is repeated over and over again, and that idea has a solid foundation, that is easy to understand. Knowing the idea, it turns into belief, then turns to truth. Truth may come from faith. If you are told many times, your mind will start to believe it. For example, if a person is said to be overweight, they are about to start believing it. If you notice something, you can not avoid it. Your thoughts will always remind you of this consciousness The more you see it, the more you will believe it. Trust and change to truth

Plato has a difference in faith and understanding. Since there is an objective truth to know, we may believe X but faith alone does not guarantee that we are right. According to Plato, there are three necessary and sufficient conditions: (1) must prospect the proposition, (2) the proposition must be true, (3) there must be good reason to support it. You must have a reason to believe it. Therefore, for Plato, knowledge is a rational and true belief

Epistleians assert whether faith is the right holder of truth. Some people prefer to explain knowledge as a reasonable true propositional system and others prefer to explain it as a reasonable truth sentence subsystem. Plato believes his Gorgias are faith holders whose faith is quoted most frequently. In Theaetetus, Socrates examined several theories about what knowledge is The last thing is that knowledge is a true belief. The meaning of "having an account" is interpreted or defined in some way. In order to know that a proposition is true, people must not only believe in the relevant real proposition but also have sufficient reasons to do so.