Keeping animals in zoos has both advantages and disadvantages.

Many animals live in the zoo. Is it right to put it in the zoo or is it wrong? In the next article, I will explain the pros and cons of this problem.

First, people can see wild, beautiful, exotic animals. They can see the life and behavior of animals. Secondly, animals have a good living environment at the zoo. They are not hungry because they have food and water. People take care of animals. In addition, animals are safe. People will not kill them. The animals are as close to the natural habitats as possible. For example, water and other natural barriers are used to separate animals from animals and tourists.

On the other hand, keeping animals in the zoo is harmful to them. These animals are forced to live in an unnatural habitat. Because there is not enough living space in the zoo, animals become unhappy and feel sick. Similarly, some animals do not breed in the zoo. Secondly, since animals hate nature, they should live free. In addition, zoo animals live on pressure. The worst thing, zoo animals can not naturally enter habitats. They do not have the chance to survive

In short, feeding on wildlife at the zoo seems to be more beneficial than harm. I think it is beneficial for all animals because they have good protection. They can feel safe

In the book "Zoos and animals' rights: protect animal ethics", Steven Bostock believes that the zoo is immoral in keeping zoo. This book explores the principle of keeping animals in zoos. Stephen Bostock develops this controversial topic by investigating past zoos and their customs. The book believes that the rights of animals can be in harmony with the continuing existence of zoos. Bostock began to argue that zoo and animal rights should not be so, even though they appear to be normally conflicting. Various technical and ethical issues related to animal rights are included in the book. Some examples are human domination of animals. Some examples are not animals in the natural environment, human cruelty, and the nature of livestock and wildlife. Stephen Bostock analyzed misleading areas. Bostock is discussing in detail the controversial topic between an atrocity animal and the zoo.

The word "zoo" is an abbreviation for "zoo" made in the 19th century. The zoo can be expressed as a group of animals found in nature. Reasons for not keeping animals under breeding are related to educational needs, research, entertainment and protection. "Zoo culture" can be traced back to the early stages of the civilization of China, Egypt, Mesopotamia. The common types of zoos that we know are city birdcages, hunting, and shelters. Zoo authorities have long claimed to contribute to the protection of endangered species of animals, but as animal rights groups talk about animal abuse in zoos, people talk about the actual movement of the zoo I am beginning to understand.

The zoo is suitable for both animals and humans. One of the main advantages is education people receive when visiting the zoo. They get direct information about how animals behave. Around the animal, the zoo usually has information describing the animal, its history and its natural location. Understanding animals brings compassion to many people and raises awareness of the wilderness that is in danger of extinction. Because zoos can breed trapped species, aggressive methods are often used for attacks by animal groups. In addition, animals are safe and safe in the zoo because they are food. Animals who are sick or injured can be treated immediately and the possibility of survival will be high. In addition, zoo animals, especially young animals, are fed regularly without threatening animals, and are killed by other animals and hunters.