The proportion of minority crimes of juvenile offenses has nearly doubled in most countries. In the news, we heard that young people are confused and committing minor crimes in shady affairs. First, they just stole apples from the market and then grabbed a small shop the next day, we learned that a 17 year old kid killed his classmate. People are concerned and this is correct. This is what we did, or they could give them severe penalties. The problem is focused on punishment and seems to focus on prevention and intervention.
Before explaining in detail about crime prevention, I will introduce some background information on juvenile delinquency. "Between 1992 and 1993, the follow-up rate for young people between the ages of 14 and 17 increased by 161% (juvenile crimes, 1). Since 1985, the arrest rate for exacerbations increased by 95%. The arrest rate of robberies increased by 57% (juvenile violence, drugs, weapons, 1) The number of boys arrested in 1994 was 94% higher than the number of people arrested in 1981. (2) "Arizona Constitution Adults who modify adults are prosecuted for murder, forced sexual assault or armed robbery at the age of 15; substitute for other young people; prosecution of juvenile prosecuted for juvenile punishment Discontinuation: Disclosure of Jurisdiction over Juveniles and Disclosure of Proceedings, Exceptions (Arizona Voting Measures, 1)
Is juvenile delinquency increasing? Concerns over the incidence and severity of juvenile delinquency have increased over the past few decades. Regions and national media regularly remind juvenile offenses to American families. Because of this rise in consciousness and concern, we are particularly focused on a new focus on the juvenile justice system, especially in and out of the youth system. Whether this raising concern is necessary or not is controversial. Policy makers and public opinion are seeking "tough" approaches to young people, but some believe there is no reason (for example, Bernard). In 1996, arrested juveniles accounted for nearly 20% of the arrest of F. B. I. Unified Crime Report. The number of juveniles arrested in 1996 increased by 35% compared to the past 10 years, but the total number of arrests increased by only 13% during the past 10 years.
The juvenile crime rate rose sharply between the late 1980s and the mid-1990s. The rise in crime rate peaked in 1994 and began to decline afterwards. Fearing that 1987 to 1994 juvenile delinquency continues to increase (practically), Congress enacted measures aimed at "to take strict measures against criminal acts". The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act of 1974 was amended to include a provision allowing states to use juveniles as adults to attempt specific violent crime and infringement of weapons. Some states also implement minimum criminal standards. Anti-criminal sentiment at this time caused a change in the juvenile justice system, which became increasingly similar to the adult (criminal) justice system. In 1967, Judge Stewart predicted that due to the youth's formal trial, the juvenile offender reflected the general view that it was a young criminal, not a young beggar.