Justifiable homicide

n. There is no intention of killing themselves, such as self defense to protect themselves and defend others, attack by law enforcement officers to carry out duties. Do not confuse this with the idea of ​​passionate crime or loss of ability, which refers to defense aimed at reducing the degree of punishment or crime. (Reference: homicide, self defense)

It is a reasonable homicide. Intention to kill or make a serious physical harm if the law provides for deprivation of perpetrators

When judges and other judges act according to the law, this is reasonable. When a minister observes the legal arrest warrant issued by the competent court. When an officer's officer or a soldier kills a legitimate order from his boss. When the party kills legitimate self-defense

3. - 1. A judge who declares the death penalty according to his duty is not a murderer; it is obvious that as the law prescribes the death penalty for a specific crime, it has to protect those who were delegated the death penalty. Therefore, the judge legally sentenced a death sentence, was legally tried, received a conviction, was sentenced to jail within jurisdiction, and tried in defendant's case. He committed a crime. crime

4-2. There are reasons for committing murder or issuing a fatal order if the magistrate or other official responsible for maintaining public safety is unable to suppress excessive acts of riots in other ways.

5-2. Staff members who have legal arrest warrants, criminal laws or civil laws and are instructed to enforce strikes according to the laws have reasons for committing murder in the event of a dangerous situation in the process of promoting the performance of their duties. He can neither save his life nor carry out the duties prescribed by the arrest warrant he enforced. When an arrest warrants him to justify a criminal, he has reason to abide by it.

6 - 3. A soldier on a job has a reason to commit a murder and obey the order of its official unless the order is clearly illegal.

7 - 4. In many cases, individuals are reasonable for murder and self-defense. See self defense. On the whole, see 1 East, P. 219; Eagle. B. 1, c. 28, s. 1, n. 22; Ali. Chief 126-139; 1 Russ. With Cr. 538; North. Enter AB. Murder, & c. E: Wash twice. 515; 4 Mass. 891; 1 Hawk R. 210; 1 Coxe R. 424; 5 Yerg. 459; 22; C. 38 Eng. C. L. R. 20

Murder may be reasonable or permitted against the surrounding environment. In this case, the murder is not considered a criminal act. A reasonable murder is a murder by law or permission. For example, wartime soldiers may be ordered to kill enemy soldiers. Generally, such murder is considered a reasonable murder unless other circumstances indicate that they are not needed, or that they are not part of a soldier's obligation. In addition, since enforcement is in compliance with state law or federal law, there are reasons to enforce the death penalty for civil servants.

The concept of reasonable murder in the criminal law (as opposed to convict murder, for example) is the borderline between excuses, excuses and deprivation. In some cases, killing is meaningful as it prevents more harm to innocent people. Murder is only justified if there is sufficient evidence to support the reasons that the concerned party believes that it poses imminent threats to their lives and happiness. The murder in this case is beyond criticism, and unlike less stringent criteria, we approve of bringing deadly power to your stand

Rational murder is a legitimate gray area. There is no clear legal standard of murder considered to be reasonable. Under reasonable circumstances, it is generally thought that defendants do not kill attackers, there is no way to defend or defend others in other ways. If the country is engaged in a war with legitimate casus belli, combatants can legally kill enemy combatants as long as they have no combat power. This principle is incorporated into international public law, and it is respected in most countries of the world. Therefore, in the absence of official war declaration or illegal action, all people who participate in the battle and murder enemy combatants may be theoretically prosecuted. Protecting the interests of the country from foreign invaders is seen as an excuse for utilitarian reasons, that is, the greatest public interest will come from enemy failure.