Justice was Served in the Film Twelve Angry Men

The judicial service of the movie "Twelve Angry Men" movie "Twelve Angry Men" I believe that justice is satisfied. But without the jury number 8, the result would be obviously different. The subtle power and confidence he showed heightened the narrow thinking of the other eleven juries. From the beginning of the movie, the jury No. 8 expressed his interest in the case, not his personal agreement. His opening in the window told his deep concern for the accused, an 18 year old Hispanic gentleman, accused of stabbing his father in an angry manner.

Despite the limit of twelve angry people "movie 12 angry people" as a thriller's success, it is a thrilling thriller. There are many restrictions on this film, but black and white film in 1957 was filled with doubts. These restrictions are scenes, action / effects, props, lack of clothes, actors are 12 middle-aged unattractive white people, and the final movie plot is pretty boring and boring. Regardless of these restrictions, director Sidney Rumet still creates an exciting thriller by concentrating the movie on an interesting and memorable character with different personality and background.

The judicial service of the movie "Twelve Angry Men" movie "Twelve Angry Men" I believe that justice is satisfied. But without the jury number 8, the result would be obviously different. The subtle power and confidence he showed heightened the narrow thinking of the other eleven juries. From the beginning of the movie, the jury No. 8 expressed his interest in the case, not his personal agreement. His opening in the window told his deep concern for the accused, an 18 year old Hispanic gentleman, accused of stabbing his father in an angry manner.

As a drama depicting the murder of a jury trial, "angry 12 men" will pay attention to the concept of justice. However, the play does not represent the American criminal justice system or abstract concept of justice, but it is simple or clear. A brief expression of the criminal justice system may be called a 12 serious male and until the 12 jury men's jury voted, the men who are diligent, reasonable and dedicated through evidence I will depict 11 - 1 deliberation, start guilty, it ends with 12 - 0, not guilty. From this we can conclude that the jury started with certain confidence and was cautious until they found certain facts. However, the jury can not judge whether the accused is not guilty or not. Although their deliberations did not find certainty, they found a suspicion that they did not feel.