Plato created a seemingly invincible philosopher in the Republic. Socrates can easily rebut against all the arguments he submitted. The justice argument about the first volume of the republic is such an example. Socrates successfully denied the various justice views presented by Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus. Socrates did not give us a clear definition of justice or refuted all views on justice, but in the first volume of our concern, he breaks his fellow's assertion I made it.
The focus of the long-term debate that seems to be a short discussion is to demonstrate as clearly as possible how people think through discussion analysis. The text under discussion is the opinion of Trashimakos' justice in the Republic of Placito, M. It is in the translation of Velázquez's philosophy. 24 (4th and 5th entries of Thrasymachus) "Socrates, as you know, some countries are governed by tyrants, others are governed by democratic majority ... ... dominance Who is - the ruling party - in all countries ... regardless of who controlled it through their own legislation - the advantage of rulers. They believe that justice comply with the law It is said that anyone who can not be punished by illegal acts or illegal acts calls me justice.
Through the Republic of Prados, Plato and his colleagues discussed Plato's theme of justice and good intentions towards self. In the early days of the Republic, did Plato raise any fundamental problems of justice? To determine the ideal state of justice, Plato believes that he must theoretically define justice theoretically to actually use justice. Platonic righteousness is defined as harmony between the three souls. There rationality leads to spirit and appetite. The justice itself is very good and the real purpose is said to be very good. It educates desires and realizes the rational ability of people. Justice is not the profit of a strong person but the benefit of a weak person. The unfair life dominated by the spirit leads to a person being addicted to physical property or property. Platonic life leads to harmony, balance and virtue. In this case, justice is satisfied and unfair life is not satisfied.