Jurisdiction (or lack thereof) of E - J jurisdiction in the global Internet era ... At the beginning of the new century, we have an Internet revolution. At the turn of the last century when the revolution was industrial rather than virtual, courts and parliaments were working to develop policies to catch up with changes in times and technologies. Labor practices, trade practices, antitrust laws, even even intellectual property law management are designed to cope with the surge of new industrialized world.
The Internet era has brought many similar challenges. As the majority of the economy is managed online within the jurisdiction of the state courts, a new legal system emerges. It was not created by the government but was created as a medieval Rex Mercatoria created by e-commerce merchants and the platform they trade. The new ecosystem benefits from a series of general rules and contractual standards for achieving interoperability of arbitration services. As part of Clarence 's vision of a judicial contract concerning the Internet, I will present some guidelines for developing block chain smart contract standards. Wise contracts that adhere to these guidelines should be arbitrary in any court. As medieval merchants chose the best cities and markets to decide controversy, all electronic merchants of our time could choose from a variety of arbitrage services using the same contract standards.
So what can we expect from Chine online? China is striving hard to establish its own Internet management model. While opening to innovation and development, make the Internet a model of government jurisdiction. It is impossible for this to succeed. But what we know is that the challenging view towards the Internet has a global impact.
There is contradiction between the principle of national sovereignty and globalization. Regulation of the Internet is restricted to the borders, but regulatory and technical decisions may have a global impact. One participant asked if the Internet could be considered accurate globally. Other participants noted that due to the reduction of the border, the Internet has regulatory challenges not only among countries but also within state bureaucracy. Regarding the latter, the Internet has forced to change the jurisdiction of certain agencies - for example, chapters related to telecommunications are currently asking about their role in privacy debates -. Blur