After the dictatorship regime, and after the deification of the Julius Caesar, the Roman Republic collapsed, so why could it be structurally sound four centuries ago? When the Republic was established at the end of the 6 th century BC, the Romans revealed that they wanted to avoid the emergence of all the monarchies that were ruled two centuries ago. (T. J. Cornell, Origin of Rome: Italy and Rome from Bronze Age to Ponge War (1000 BC - 264 BC), London and New York: Routledge, 1995;
Julius Caesar contributed in many ways to the decline of the Republic of Rome, but the most serious was three. The first was to start a civil war, and the Republic did not really recover in January BC. Caesar worked for 10 years at Governor Goul (Governor), started using this position to conquer large, acquire wealth and fame, making it more powerful than anyone in Rome. His opponent in the Senate wishes to sue him; however, Roman law does not allow someone holding a judge to be prosecuted. So Caesar tried to insist on his order until he was elected consul; his enemy did not want it, not only they could sue him, but he was in a different military affair I did not have the ability to obtain orders. After a lot of complicated negotiations which eventually collapsed, the Senate issued an urgent order against Caesar, and his party tribes fled the town
Julius Caesar (100 BC - 44 BC) Under the Caesar, the Roman Empire expanded to another place. I crossed the Rhine for the first time and entered the UK. However, Caesar oversaw the collapse of the Republic of Rome and the collapse of the Roman Empire. Caesar's motto is "I came, I saw it, I conquered it." Mahatma Gandhi (1869-1948) Gandhi was a major political constraint for self-determination and independence in India. Gandhi affected millions of people through his non-violent protest. Under his leadership, India gained independence, but at the expense of different countries, two countries were created: India and Pakistan. Gandhi is still honored as the father of Indian state