Julius Caesar = Bad leader?

The best answer: Julius Caesar becomes a dictator (a person who governs everything in place) and rotates around himself, but it still helps everyone there as well ... so that is a bit intermediate It is the situation. He is very kind, but he can not be a selfish and dictator. If you need to know how he died, he killed a group of people, mainly the senators, in fear of becoming king, so they stabbed him. I'm glad I could help you! Please do your best.

Is Julius Caesar a good leader? This is a problematic question. Somewhat similar to the question, is McDonald's good or bad? You can say that the food is delicious, but it is not good for you! Julius Caesar is a controversial character in history; you can discuss his leadership and the impact on Rome. One of Caesar's earliest examples as a good leader came from his young age. Julius Caesar was born in a Roman aristocrat; they are technically considered members of the Roman aristocracy, but they do not have much money. This fact makes Caesar clearly disadvantageous. Despite the lack of wealth and influence, Caesar considers himself a wise and confident person. When he was young he joined the army, demonstrated his power in the battlefield, and eventually founded his own army. In his initial career Caesar succeeded in serving multiple positions within the government. This is a proof of confidence in the Roman ability.

Julius Caesar can be regarded as a leader of good and evil. The ability of Caesar to soar and command the army in such a young age is a good example of his natural leadership. As a consul, or as one of the two who led Rome at the same time, he made many changes to improve Rome; as Governor General, he could conquer the territory of Rome It was. As a dictator, Caesar continues to improve Rome by reforming the tax system and improving the calendar.