Judgement

Judgment (or judgment) [1] is the evaluation of evidence of decision. [2] [3] [4] This term has four uses.

Informal and psychological - used to refer to the quality of cognitive and judicial abilities of a particular individual and is often referred to as wisdom or identification

Legal - refers to the final result, statement or ruling based on the considered tradeoff, used in the context of a legal judgment, called "rule". For detailed explanation, please refer to the spelling explanation.

Religion - the concept of salvation refers to God's judgment in determining heaven or hell for all and all. God's assessment of human value: "Good" decision conveys great value, "evil" brings something worthless.

Zheng Wangya, I will be waiting. (2014) The contextual effect of a series of questions is based on the quantum nature of human judgment, the minutes of the National Academy of Sciences in the United States of America, Vol. 111 26, 9431-9436

Both judgment and judgment appear on printed matter. Let's start with a new and new judgment example. In 1797, writer Samuel Johnson used the judgment to define other terms in his English dictionary. For example, prejudice is "judgment is formed without prior examination". In a recent history, the article published by the athlete after smoking, the article from the BBC announced his approval: "Now I know the health risks, my judgment is It is very bad. "You will see an announcement about the new game. "War Machine: Today I will vote on Xbox 360," the site announced.

West historians have long denied the desire to provide "historical judgment" since the 20th century. The purpose of historical judgment or interpretation is different from the purpose of legal judgment and it is necessary to formulate it promptly and eventually after the incident. One problem related to historical judgment is collective memory. Pseudo-history is a term applied to virtually historical text, but it differs from standard historical practice in such a way as to compromise its conclusion. Work closely related to deceptive historical revisionism and draw controversial conclusions from new, speculative or controversial historical evidence, especially in the areas of national, political, military and religious affairs, Often dismissed as false history