In this academic paper, Swales outlines his views on the talk community. He explained a group of people who strive to achieve a common goal while sharing a series of ideas and rules, a discourse community; unlike the voice community, you can undertake a discourse community. To better understand what the discourse community is, he outlines the six defined features of the discourse community: 1. The discourse community has a widely recognized common public goal . Since the discourse community uses one or more kinds of communication to promote its purpose, it learns a specific vocabulary with proper level of appropriate content and discourse. The limit value of members of vocational knowledge "Concept of discourse community (1990). By defining these characteristics, you can analyze community, decide the characteristics of the discourse, participation method of new members, and communication method.
Interestingly, the discourse community can compare with a group of fish: everyone has a common goal, some go and go, they tell in a way we can not understand and finally die born. But I do not like artists adding fluffs, and I understand that Swales is academic, and he has many unrelated explanations / sentences / words / paragraphs . There are many things to remember. I agree with the idea of the difference between the speech community and the discourse community. I think humans adapt to surrounding words over time; I use words and pronunciation. So I believe that the speech community can participate by time. Overall, this article can be easily placed on six slide slides. I understand his distinction between the speech and the discourse community, but it is not completely effective. I can only explain the situation where children learn first language. But his nephew said differently. In the process, the child learned the second child. I can not find academic materials now. However, the idea of the discourse community is reasonable.
The text as a writer will allow me to analyze my different discourse function. Write for a specific reader. And join my own discourse community. To do something for yourself or to do for your community, I can incorporate this text into my own sentences by pondering my choices. This text allows me to draw the differences between my terms used in school and the slang that I use with my friends. You can academically analyze various kinds of communication methods such as why I share the way to save money, why my friends come and go, and text, video chat, face-to-face. Finally, this text provides an understanding of the new community forms that have never been learned. We can analyze more deeply how people gather and make them stronger and more interesting.
John Swales's concept of discourse community is harder to read than plain text, even after reading twice. It is difficult, but the beginning of the text is useful to me. Because it warns beforehand that Swale's writing is very dry and uses technical terms. This made me sit down and in fact I focused more on writing than usual. Reading is very confused, but Swales is doing a good job to summarize the definition of his interactive community. Swales uses six predefined functions to identify groups of individuals as discourse communities. These features give me a better understanding of the discourse community as it outlines the main points. But the most striking thing for me is the last statement that the discourse community has the relevant level of relevant content and discourse expertise.
John Swales, University of Michigan, University of Michigan, Professor of Linguistics. In 1990 Swales wrote an article called "The Discourse Community's Concept". Sales defines the discourse community (a group of people with the same language rules) and describes the six characteristics that the community should follow to become a discourse community. The six features are as follows: James Porter's textual dialogue and discourse The community is an article published in rhetorical commentary on the content of the discourse community's original text in the autumn of 1986. Text interactivity is a network that conveys sentences and voices (Porter, 1986). Porter insists that writing is very similar to reading, and the background of the work written is an explanation of the reader (Porter, 1986).