John Stuart Mill's Harm Principle

John Stuart Mill explains the concept of freed in various ways. I will focus on his view on the principles of harm and want to talk a bit about his view on freedom of movement. The principle of harm and freedom of movement is two sub-themes of Mill's broad idea of ​​the concept of freedom. In addition to planning to discuss and explain these parts in the concept of freedom, I also plan to discuss my thoughts and emotions. I have several differences in Moore's harm principle; they will be stated and explained.

Many people tried to oppose this morality and paternal error by relying on John Stuart Mill's "Injury Principle" (Mill 1859: Chapter 1). However, in any interpretation, the principle of harm is too strict to contradict retaliatory justice, even if there is no other interest (such as prevention of harm), the principle of retaliatory justice is the principle of harm Varies. You should follow the desert (Tomlin 2014). A wider, more defensive liberalistic position is that the error related to punishment must be a citizen's correct concern (Duff 2001: § 4.3; Duff 2011).

I am a classic liberal like John Stuart Mill. John Stuartir's "harm principle" is at the heart of the political philosophy that I support. That is, "The only purpose of the power of a member of a civilized community to violate its will is to prevent it from harming others, for himself, in his own body and mind , Individuals are sovereign. " The principles of harm are different from public health interventions addressing public issues such as product safety, sanitation, vaccines, water quality. Those laws that are not nanny state because they do not mean to allow individuals to send their lives according to specific rules or standards.

But none of these hatreds is inherently bad. Let us all see John Stuart Mill's "harm principle". In his exceptional moral and political philosophy of "very free title" "God of Freedom", Moore defines the theory that the government should intervene the "injury principle" to contain individual actions I believe. If a man wants to sit in his apartment all day and shoot heroin and spray paint, it will be more powerful for him. If a woman wishes to bet on her heritage, be brave. one more! If someone wants to do self-injury, I regret listening to this, but that is not a government issue. "Injury principle" states that if the citizen acts to harm others, the government has the right to interfere with that citizen's problem. It is tragic to drink a person's self and it may affect her loved ones in a very painful way, but the government does not say anything about that matter. In theory, at least