John Locke on Personal Identity

In order to express an opinion on Locke 's actions against an 80 - year - old man accused of war crimes, he really does not remember the need to analyze the complex definition of identity. In this article I will explain Locke's ideas and theories, and the exclusion process to infer how Locke evaluates the assertion. Why should I fully analyze the definition of identity? Locke believes that the identity of things is not always easy to distinguish as much as you look at your eyes for the first time, so you can identify all identities as physical, biological entity identity , And from the ultimate person's identity.

John Locke believes that the identity (or self) of an individual is based on consciousness (ie memory), not the essence of the soul and body. Volume 2 (1689) of Chapter 27 entitled "Identity and Diversity of Papers Concerning Human Understanding" is considered as one of the first modern conceptualization of consciousness, ie, self-identification of self-repetition I will. As critics like Nietzsche point out, through this recognition moral responsibility is attributed to subjectivity and punishment, and sin is justified.

John Locke often uses his personal identity theory consciousness to separate personal identity from material identity or material identity. This is a purely psychological explanation of identity, which affects the judgment of moral responsibility (rock develops), but consciousness itself is not the same as moral sentiment. It can be regarded as yourself, which is wise, is reasonable and introspective, and at the same time can only be realized through a kind of consciousness that can not be separated from thinking. It seems to be indispensable: no one can perceive his perception without noticing it. (Article 2.27.9)