John Dewey's Criticisms of Traditional Philosophy

Criticism of Dewey's traditional philosophy: This article discusses the general applicability of John Dewey's philosophical "tradition" and shows how his criticism comes from his naturalistic philosophical approach. This topic is important as Dewey understands today's argument about the role of philosophy. In 1935, he foresaw a lot of criticisms of "later" Wittgenstein's establishment of a post criterion, separation of language and behavior, and criticism of spiritual privatization - but Dewey still remains for metaphysics and "thinking" Can be used. "I believe in the essence of Dewey's criticism.

This article is based on the recent discovery of the new testimony of the original manuscript Dewey written in a lecture on Chinese social philosophy and political philosophy and is a new study of New Duran's social philosophy presented for the first time here. This article focuses on his attempt to focus on the contradicting relationship between social philosophy and Dewey during his long career and to develop his own social philosophy from 1919 to 1923. This article examines the contribution of China's social philosophy and political philosophy lecture to Dewey's Social Philosophy Project and shows that our understanding of Dewey's social philosophy is significantly hindered by the inability to obtain the original text . Finally, the important possibility of Dewey's social philosophy has been appreciated.

Criticism of Dewey's traditional philosophy: This article discusses the general applicability of John Dewey's philosophical "tradition" and shows how his criticism comes from his naturalistic philosophical approach. This topic is important as Dewey understands today's argument about the role of philosophy. In 1935, he foresaw a lot of criticisms of "later" Wittgenstein's establishment of a post criterion, separation of language and behavior, and criticism of spiritual privatization - but Dewey still remains for metaphysics and "thinking" Can be used. "I believe in the essence of Dewey's criticism.

For Dewey, moral philosophy has clear normative and ethical functions. Dewey would like to criticize normative criteria and I would like to show a more reasonable moral goal. "The central question of philosophy is about the relationship between the beliefs of natural science and the beliefs of values ​​towards the essence of things and we will use this term to mean those with legal authority in the direction of action" He wrote. The suggestion is that we should use what he calls wisdom of moral experiments. This means that ethical investigations need to use the same methodological principles as used in scientific investigations. We should designate scientific criticisms as "moral" about our institution and behavioral patterns.