I would like to discuss the philosophy of Jean Paul Sutter's "No Exit" and its existentialist theme Jean Paul Sartre and incorporate it into his theater "No Exit". Embedded in role interaction is the theme of many Sartre philosophy. Personal attributes help to show some of the more dominant ideas in Sartre's work. Each of the three characters in the play shows distinctive features of sexual perversions, malicious, and conscious interactions. This drama takes an interesting scene, the scene of the afterlife.
In his drama "No Exports" Jean-Paul Sartre explores the basic theme of existentialism through three roles. The first theme, Garcinin, accepted a certain existentialist idea to some extent. The second role, Inez seems to fully understand what is considered as being. Estelle is the third person and does not seem to understand these ideas, but she will not accept these ideas when presented to her for the first time. One similarity between the three is that they seem to accept their reasons in hell at some point.
French existentialist Jean - Paul Sutter and Albert Camus understand this as well. Sartre drew a life in his drama - No exit - the last line of the drama was a word of resignation, "Let's continue," so Sartre wrote an "unpleasant" presence somewhere It was. Camus also believes life is absurd. At the end of his short story "The Stranger", the coronation hero instantly found out that the universe has no meaning and that God does not give it. Even if life ends in a grave, there is no difference whether that person lives as Stalin or as a saint. Fate is ultimately irrelevant to your actions, so you can live as you want. As Dostoevsky said, "Everything is permitted if there is no eternal life." Based on this, authors such as Ian Land are absolutely right in praise of selfish virtue. I live for myself; no one thinks you are responsible!