James E. Porter’s Idea of Originality in Intertextuality and the Discourse Community

For foreign students, especially when it is expected to be "ingenious", the task is twice as difficult. In order to become a good writer, it is widely believed that we need to present our own ideas and opinions. According to an English teacher, originality is an idea that no one has ever written, and we admit authors that influence and support our idea - so we do not steal. But they did not realize that what they call plagiarism might not be a bad thing.

James Potter's textual interaction and discourse community is an article published in a rhetorical commentary on the content of the original text of the discourse community in the autumn of 1986. Text interactivity is a network that conveys sentences and voice (Porter, 1986). Porter insists that writing is very similar to reading, and the background of the written work is an explanation of the reader (Porter, 1986). Porter cites the interaction between the two forms of text, ie the repetition of certain texts, including paraphrases and traditional claims, and the assumptions assumed to be known or common sense. Something (Porter, 1986)

James Porter defines the discourse community as follows: "A local temporary constraint system defined by a set of texts (more commonly exercises) combined by a common focus. The discourse community Regardless of whether there is a statement or not, it is a text system, important history, mechanism of authority, institutional hierarchy, vested rights, etc. "The argument theorists Chaim Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts - Tyceta are all members of the discourse community He mentioned the conditionality of discourse of the following. Concept: "All languages ​​are community languages, which are communities tied through biological relationships or through practice of common areas and technologies.The terms used, their meanings and definitions are only for thinking No way, method, external environment and the way the users of these terms are known in the traditional context. Deviations from use need proof ... "

In order to better read Murray's text, I looked to James Porter and its intertext and discourse community theory (Porter 87-96). How all the texts are inevitably related to each other, fragments of other texts, and how the text is managed by a specific social framework that defines the interrelationship between the texts. When it was recognized from the point of view of the sentence, it turned out that Murray's argument became stronger. Murray's view is persuasive and most readers inevitably recognize that we include some of our own and we are writing about our view and experience. But his evidence is inadequate. Murray's choice of writing is various, but it can be intuitive and personalized. Murray can use any of his poems, but he chose to talk about his life at the age of 64. He offered us another evidence: If it is not an article about it, the Boston Globe newspaper column may be more eye-catching in his life.