Jacob and Arminianism

Introduction Throughout the history of the Church, John Calvin is considered one of the world's best reformist theologians. He is known for defending the election and atonement of God. Jacob Arminius is known as a Calvin challenger through his theological history and teaches different views on elections often referred to as aluminism. After Calvinism occupied the reformed circle, aluminism continued. Jacob Aminus had a hard time dealing with many of the questions Calvin raised in the election of God's grace.

The basic theology of methodology is called aluminism (after Jacob Arminius (1560-1609), he questioned some doctrines held by John Calvin). Aluminism emphasizes the individual's ability to obey or reject the free will of Christ and the loss of salvation. This is a response to Calvin 's planned doctrine, through which God determines the ultimate destiny of a person, regardless of whether it is eternal or cursed. Aluminism rejects all five points of Calvinism * (except for complete degeneration). An exception to the opinion of the Aliens is being observed by the Methodist Church in Wales. They prefer calvinism in their doctrine. Like many Protestants, Methodist insists on two sacraments: fellowship with baptism (Lord Supper)

The original belief of Jacobus Arminius is usually defined as aluminism, but in a broader sense this term may include teachings such as Hugo Grotius, John Wesley and others. Classical Amini and Wesley's Amini are two main thought groups. Wesleyan aluminism is often the same as Methodism. The two systems of calvinism and aminism have history and many doctrines, as well as the history of Christian theology. But due to the difference between sacred destiny and election doctrine, many people believe that these schools of thought are against each other. In short, the difference is whether the eventually allows God to save his will to save all the will of the individual (in the doctrine of Aminia), or is the divine grace restricted to unbearable and reliable things ( Calvinism) can endure. ) Many people think that theological differences are important differences in doctrine, but others think that they are relatively small.

We can become "Carmian", the idea of ​​combining Calvinism and aluminism into one system is attractive, but unreasonable. Logically, one doctrine can be a Calvinist, another doctrine to become an Alienians, but we can not respect the same doctrine at the same time. I can not believe that my belief will ultimately depend on the choice of God. Or at least, I can not believe it and can not remain reasonable. I may believe that black is white.