It Is Acceptable to Use Animals for Resarch

There was discussion on the use of animals in biomedical research and experiments. They have been used in this field for centuries and have proven to be highly beneficial and have contributed far more than anticipated in medical research. By applying to animals research, the medical field has greatly improved. However, in these experiments, many animals were killed and animals had to undergo a lot of pain and suffering. Taking these advantages and corn into account, problems arise when animals are used in experiments.

As responsible scientists do not want to use animals or cause unnecessary pain even if avoided, scientists accept the management of animals used in the study. More generally, the biological scientific community recognizes that animals should only be used for research within the ethical framework. With the implementation of the 1986 Animal Science Act, the UK has incorporated this ethical framework into law more than any other country. It is beyond the EU Directive 86/609 / EEC on the protection of animals used for experiments. And other scientific objectives are currently being revised (Matthiessen et al., 2003). The law requires that any damage to animals be studied in research proposals including animal use. This includes detailed investigation of specific procedures and experiments as well as the number and type of animals used. Next, compare these tradeoffs with the potential benefits of the project.

In the current Ethics Guidelines, non-human animals can be used for scientific purposes, but only when the benefits of the research exceed the damage (physical or psychological) given to the animals. With this in mind, psychologists can use specific research methods that can not be used by humans. Due to extreme emotional stress experienced by participants, Stanley Milgram's experiments are raising questions about the ethics of scientific experimentation. It measures whether research participants are willing to comply with the authority figures directing them to perform actions that conflict with their personal conscience.

Unfortunately, the practice of biopsy and animal experiments is totally acceptable and legal. This is the worst form of animal cruelty in our social institutionalization and sanctions. Laboratory animals are monotonous, stressful and very unnatural, but invasive experiments still exist, even if the endpoint is death. The quality of animal experiments is actually up to your requirements. But, if allowed by society, even though these benefits sacrifice the life of an animal, there are several advantages to be made.