Accepting funds for sex is a lifestyle choice or hostile choice for Dutch female prostitutes, especially in Amsterdam. Participants involved in the legalization of prostitution policy are vulnerable to ambiguities, including differences in social, political, health and economic opinions. Since legalization of prostitution in 2000, criminal activity has been decreasing in Amsterdam, where workers can improve autonomy and improve working conditions.
Regulation: Prostitution can be considered a legitimate business, and prostitution and prostitution employment is legal but regulated; the majority of the Netherlands, Germany, Australia, and some positions in Nevada (Nevada prostitution reference). Regulatory levels are very different, for example, in the Netherlands prostitutes do not need to undergo a mandatory medical examination (see Dutch prostitution), but in Nevada the rules are very strict (see Nevada Prostitution).
When the Netherlands legalizes prostitution in 1988, one of its main goals was to suppress trafficking in persons and criminal prostitution. Despite their best intentions, illegal prostitutes are still widespread and prostitutes continue to be abused by pimping. Likewise, the Nevada illegal prostitution industry is estimated to be about four times the legitimate business. If legalization does not actually protect prostitutes, it is simply a cruel income source for the government.
Legalization of prostitution or non-criminalization is one of the fundamental causes of sex trafficking. One argument about the legalization of prostitution in the Netherlands is that legalization will help end the exploitation of desperate immigrant women trafficked as a result of prostitution. According to the report of the government Budapest group *, 80% of women in the Dutch brothel are being trafficked from other countries (Budapest Group, 1999: 11). In early 1994, the International Migrant Organization (IOM) said in the Netherlands alone that nearly 70% of trafficked women came from Central and Eastern Europe and Central and Eastern European countries (Immigration, 1995: 4) .